Absztrakt
The incident / Accident in the pharmaceutical company is a major concern in the modern world. It is very important to know the various causes of the injury / accident while handling the deadly chemicals in the pharmaceutical sector. The collection of data for the incidents / accidents will help us to learn lessons from the past. The incident / Accident data is collected from the pharmaceutical industry from October 2017 to September 2021 in the Attibele, Bangalore, southern part of India. During the period there were 20 recorded incident / accident in the factory. Human failure for the classification for the various incidents / accidents are classified based on the Error by humans and violations in the seven different blocks, these are further classified as minor, major and dangerous. The percentage of the failure of the cause of the incident / accident are presented in the article. The incidents/ accidents were reported in the intermediate block > outside Intermediate block > Finished goods block > Pilot plant = Research & development block = Stores area = Effluent treatment plant area. These types of incidents / accidents, which were minor occurrences are two numbers, major and dangerous occurrences are five and thirteen numbers, which is a major cause of the concern. The human failures are responsible for the incident / accident. Its percentage, which varied from 5 (Routine and slip) % to 37.5 (Lapses) %. Various corrective and preventive action for each of the incident / accident has been presented. The human failures can be avoided by adopting strict safety rules and regulation in all the concern departments.
Hivatkozások
Broadribb MP. What have we really learned? Twenty-five years after Piper Alpha. Process. Saf. Prog 2014; 34(1): 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.11691
Benner L. Accident investigation data: Users unrecognized challenges. Saf. Sci 2019; 118: 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.021
Fu G, Wang J, Yan M. Anatomy of Tianjin Port fire and explosion: Process and causes. Process Saf. Prog 2016; 35(3): 216–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.11837
Wei jiang, wei han. Analysis of 2.26 Keeper chemical industries hazardous chemical explosion accident on FTA and HFACS. Int. J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 13(10): 2131. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102151
Baybutt P. The treatment of domino effects in process hazard analysis. Process. Saf. Prog 2014; 34: 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.11687
Shweta Sachdeva. Domino Effects in the process Industries: A Review. Turkish online journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TQJQI) 2021; 12(7): 3596-3606. https://tojqi.net/index.php/journal/article/view/4291
Zi-jian Ni, Yanzhang Wang, ZhigangYin. Relative risk model for assessing domino effect in chemical process industry. Saf. Sci 2016; 87: 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.03.026
Jianhao Wang, Mingwei Yan. Application of an Improved Model for Accident Analysis: A Case Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019; 16(15): 2756. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16152756
Srinivas Sivaraman, Tauseef SM, Siddiqui NA. Investigative and probabilistic perspective of the accidental release of styrene: a case study in Vizag, India. Journal of Process safety and environmental protection 2022; 158: 55-69.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.11.034
Nagaraj R. Rising industrial accidents: Fallout of boosting ‘Ease of Doing Business’, centre for development studies, Ideas for India. (28th April 2021). https://www.ideasforindia.in/topics/governance/rising-industrial-accidents-fallout-of-boosting-easeof-doing-business.html
Zhang, N, Shen SL, Zhou AN, et al. Brief report on the March 21, 2019, explosions at a chemical factory in Xiangshui, China. Process Saf. Prog 2019; 38(2): e12060. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12060.
JingWang, Yunxiao Fan, YiNiu. Routes to failure: Analysis of chemical accidents using the HFACS. Journal of Loss prevention in the process industries 2022; 75: 104695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104695
Wenling Guan, Qingwen Liu, Chengjie Dong. Risk assessment method for industrial accident consequences and human vulnerability in urban areas. Journal of loss prevention in the process industries 2022; 76: 104745.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2022.104745
Zhu Y, Qian X, Liu Z, et al. Analysis and assessment of the Qingdao crude oil vapor explosion accident: Lessons learnt. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind 2015; 33: 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2015.01.004
Fu G, Chen P, Zhao Z, et al. Safety is about doing the right thing. Process. Saf. Prog 2019; 38 (4): e12044. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12044.
Seungho Jung, Seungkyoo Pak, Kwanwoo Lee, et al. Classification of Human Failure in Chemical Plants: Case Study of Various Types of Chemical Accidents in South Korea from 2010 to 2017. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021; 18(21): 11216.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111216
Terry MS, Daniel, MJ. Assessing and preventing serious incidents with behavioural science: Enhancing Heinrich’s triangle for the 21st century. J. Organ. Behav 2017; 37: 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2017.1340923
Bird FE, Germain GL. Practical Loss Control Leadership, 1st ed.; Institute Publishing: Loganville, GA, USA, 1985. 10–54. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Practical+Loss+Control+Leadership&author=F.E.+Bird&author=G.L.+Germain&publication_year=1985&
WHO. Occupational health and safety in Africa, in World Health Organization with Input of WHO/ILO Joint Effort Taskforce, M. Report, Ed 2001. 5-6, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Tetsuya M, Matti SH, Takashi M. et al. Analysis of Japanese occupational health services for small and medium scale enterprises in comparison with the Finnish system. Journal of Occupational Health 1999; 41(2): 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.41.115
KOSHA. Guideline South Korea. Technical Guidance on Root Cause Analysis Techniques. Available online: http://kosha.or.kr/ Kosha/data/guidance (accessed on 13 August 2021) 2021.
Berhanemeskel H, Mesafint M, Yihun M. e al. Assessment of Occupational Injury among Industrial Workers in the Bahir Dar City of Northwest Ethiopia: Institution-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Hindawi Journal of Environmental and Public Health 2021 Article ID 27930538, pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2793053
Hindu. Three workers injured in the explosion in the chemical factory. The Hindu, Bengaluru, September 25, 2021. https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/bangalore/three-workers-injured-in-explosion-at-chemical-factory/article36660899.ece
Murphy JF. Emergency Management: It Starts with a Question in the Design Stages “What Can Go Wrong?”. Process Saf. Prog 2017; 2036: 325. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.11938.
Amine Dakkoune, Lamiae Vernieres-Hassimi, Sebastien Leveneur, et al. Analysis of thermal runaway events in French chemical industry. Journal of loss prevention in the process industries 2019; 62: 103938.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2019.103938
Shobit Srivastava. Dahej Chemicals factory blast: Is it another case of negligence. Down to Earth. Published on 4th June 2020. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/blog/pollution/dahej-chemicals-factory-blast-is-it-another-case-of-negligence--71560
Silla I, Navajas J, Koves GK. Organizational culture and a safety-conscious work environment:The mediating role of employee communication satisfaction. J. Saf. Res 2017; 61: 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2017.02.005
Fu G, Yin W, Dong J. Safety Management—A Behaviour-Based Approach to Accident causation: the “2-4”model and its safety implications in coal mines. J China Coal Soc 2013; 38(7): 1123–1129.
Hara K, Mori M, Ishitake T. et al. Results of recognition test on Japanese subjects of the labels presently used in Japan and the UN-GHS labels. Journal of occupational health 2007; 49: 260-267. file:///C:/Users/YUDHII~1/AppData/Local/Temp/E49_4_02.pdf.
Khalid S, Ziara1, Ibraheem AK et al. Chemical Safety Awareness for Undergraduate Analytical Chemistry Students: A Case Study at Baghdad University, Republic of Iraq. Sch Int J Chem Mater Sci 2021; 4(4): 30-35. fromhttps://saudijournals.com/media/articles/SIJCMS_44_30-35.pdf